PPB

Project Profile Bangladesh

Show a simple linear regression example demonstrating how to validate a cost driver using historical plant data.

To validate whether a candidate cost driver has a strong cause-and-effect relationship with a cost pool, plant managers use Simple Linear Regression. This statistical method tests how well changes in the driver (independent variable, $X$) explain changes in total activity cost (dependent variable, $Y$).

Show a simple linear regression example demonstrating how to validate a cost driver using historical plant data.


Linear Regression Equation

The relationship is expressed as:

$$Y = a + bX$$
Where:

  • $Y$ = Total Activity Cost (Dependent Variable)

  • $X$ = Cost Driver Volume (Independent Variable)

  • $a$ = Fixed Cost component (Y-intercept)

  • $b$ = Variable Cost per unit of driver (Slope)

Step-by-Step Example: Machine Maintenance Cost vs. Machine Hours

A plant manager wants to evaluate if Machine Hours ($X$) is a valid cost driver for Monthly Maintenance Cost ($Y$).

1. Historical Plant Data (6 Months)

MonthMachine Hours (X)Maintenance Cost (Y)X2XY
Jan100$2,20010,000$220,000
Feb120$2,50014,400$300,000
Mar150$3,10022,500$465,000
Apr180$3,70032,400$666,000
May200$4,00040,000$800,000
Jun220$4,50048,400$990,000
Sum ($\sum$)970$20,000167,700$3,441,000
  • $n = 6$ months

  • Mean of $X$ ($\bar{X}$) = $\frac{970}{6} = 161.67 \text{ hours}$

  • Mean of $Y$ ($\bar{Y}$) = $\frac{20,000}{6} = \$3,333.33$

2. Calculate Slope ($b$) and Fixed Intercept ($a$)

$$\text{Slope } (b) = \frac{n \sum (XY) - (\sum X)(\sum Y)}{n \sum (X^2) - (\sum X)^2}$$
$$b = \frac{6(3,441,000) - (970)(20,000)}{6(167,700) - (970)^2} = \frac{20,646,000 - 19,400,000}{1,006,200 - 940,900} = \frac{1,246,000}{65,300} \approx \mathbf{19.08}$$
$$\text{Intercept } (a) = \bar{Y} - b\bar{X} = 3,333.33 - (19.08 \times 161.67) = 3,333.33 - 3,084.66 = \mathbf{248.67}$$
Cost Function:

$$\text{Maintenance Cost } (Y) = \$248.67 + \$19.08(X)$$

3. Evaluate Statistical Validity

Plant managers evaluate two metrics to confirm whether Machine Hours is a valid driver:

A. Coefficient of Determination ($R^2$)
$R^2$ measures the percentage of cost variance explained by the driver.

$$R^2 = \frac{[\sum (X - \bar{X})(Y - \bar{Y})]^2}{\sum (X - \bar{X})^2 \sum (Y - \bar{Y})^2} \approx \mathbf{0.995}$$
  • Rule of Thumb: An $R^2 \ge 0.80$ indicates a strong cost driver.

  • Result: $R^2 = 0.995$ ($99.5\%$), meaning machine hours almost completely explain maintenance cost variations.

B. Visual / Residual Check
Plotted data points must closely align along the linear regression line without wild scatter or non-linear curves.

Cost ($)
  ^
  |                                 * (Jun: 220 hrs, $4,500)
  |                         * (May: 200 hrs, $4,000)
  |                 * (Apr: 180 hrs, $3,700)
  |         * (Mar: 150 hrs, $3,100)
  | * (Feb: 120 hrs, $2,500)
  |* (Jan: 100 hrs, $2,200)
  +--------------------------------------------> Machine Hours (X)

Decision Criteria Summary

MetricCalculated ValueAcceptance ThresholdVerdict
$R^2$ (Correlation Strength)$0.995$$\ge 0.80$Valid Driver
Slope Sign ($b$)$+19.08$PositiveLogical Relationship
Fixed Overhead ($a$)$\$248.67$$\ge 0$Economically Plausible
Because all criteria are met, Machine Hours is validated as a statistically reliable cost driver for Activity-Based Costing allocation.
← Newer Article Older Article →